This is the latest in a series, see here for a lichen key, here for a moss key, and here for a description of Walnut Canyon biocrusts.
Wupatki-Wupatki
was the largest national monument examined. We found that in the case of
potential biocrust abundance low to medium values were observed within the monument. All of our outputs suggest
that the areas where biocrusts attain the greatest importance are the limestone
flats above the Doney cliffs, including Antelope Prairie. This conclusion is
deceptive because it does not take into account eolian reworked cinders.
Surfaces covered by cinders are not available habitat for BSCs. We had no
available spatial data on the extent of cinder deposits, therefore we generated
a map of cinder cover based upon interpolation of our surface data (Figure 1). Amos et al.
(1981) provide data on thicker cinder deposits, but do not address the thin
eolian deposition of cinders that strongly influences western Wupatki. Because
mapping cinder cover was outside the scope of our project, this data should be
considered a rough approximation only. The cinder map reveals that a large
proportion of Wupatki that otherwise could support BSCs
likely does not because a large proportion of the available surface is covered
with cinders (Figure 2a). There may however be less cinder deposition on the
northern portions of the Doney Cliffs where our models predict high potential
for BSC abundance, function and biodiversity.
Figure 1. Surface cinder cover in Wupatki National Monument, estimated by interpolation from non-systematic ground-based samples. |
Overall,
BSC cover is sparse in Wupatki, apparently due to several factors. The cinder
deposits of the western portions virtually prohibit biocrust development because
there is simply no soil at the surface, i.e. no available habitat. To the east,
the Wupatki basin has less cinder deposition but is quite arid and hot, and is
lacking in sandy soils which tend to support higher biocrust cover on the Colorado
Plateau. This area consists mainly of highly eroded exposures of moenkopi
shale, and alluvial terraces of various ages. Minor biocrust development was detected on some alluvial
terraces, but was not clearly related to terrace age. Occasionally northern exposures
(especially shrub mounds within such sites) supported some crust cover (Figure 2). It is possible, especially in the Wupatki
Basin, that the landscape is not at its potential due to the legacy of
disturbance both from livestock and the widespread prehistoric agriculture that
occurred there. Calcareous sandy soils and non-bentonitic shale-derived soils
in low disturbance conditions generally support greater biocrust cover than that observed in the Wupatki Basin.
No comments:
Post a Comment